News

Why Forbes Labeled Ripple, Cardano and Fantom as Zombie Tokens

Published

on

In a recent Forbes article, cryptocurrencies such as Ripple (XRP), Cardano (ADA) and Ghost (FTM) have been highlighted as “zombie tokens”. These have multi-billion dollar valuations despite minimal practical utility.

These “good-for-nothing” blockchains rely heavily on speculation rather than functional demand, reflecting traits of a speculative bubble rather than technology-driven markets.

Ripple (XRP), Cardano (ADA), Fantom (FTM) are useless: Forbes

Despite RippleAmbitions to revolutionize bank transfers by competing directly with SWIFT have largely failed to achieve its goals. The network continues to operate, processing $583,000 in transaction fees last year, a tiny figure compared to its $36 billion market value.

In a new one relationshipForbes explains that this discrepancy indicates its speculative nature rather than actual financial utility.

Cardan AND Ghost tell a similar story. With lofty market valuations of $23 billion and significant sums tied up in the treasury, their real-world applications are lagging.

Despite its global development plans and the founder’s public commitments Charles Hoskinson, Cardano has yet to move beyond the pilot phases in many aspects. Meanwhile, Fantom, while less publicized, rides the same wave of high speculation with minimal transaction volume.

“It’s as if early-stage venture capital funds or companies raise too much money and don’t know how to deploy it properly. There is no way to return the treasure to investors,” said Matt Hougan, CIO of Bitwise Asset Management.

Forbes classifies over 20 cryptocurrencies as zombies due to their lack of substantial user bases or functional applications outside of trading platforms. This situation highlights a larger problem within the cryptocurrency market. Considerable capital is tied up in questionable projects futures and usefulness.

To know more: 11 Cryptocurrencies to Add to Your Portfolio Before Altcoin Season

Forbes list of good-for-nothing blockchains. Source: Forbes

This scenario pushes investors and users to proceed with caution, as the longevity and success of these platforms depends largely on market sentiment rather than fundamental value.

Disclaimer

In compliance with Trust Project guidelines, BeInCrypto is committed to providing impartial and transparent reporting. This news article aims to provide accurate and timely information. However, readers are advised to independently verify the facts and consult a professional before making any decisions based on this content. Please note that our Terms and conditions, Privacy PolicyAND Disclaimer They have been updated.

Fuente

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Información básica sobre protección de datos Ver más

  • Responsable: Miguel Mamador.
  • Finalidad:  Moderar los comentarios.
  • Legitimación:  Por consentimiento del interesado.
  • Destinatarios y encargados de tratamiento:  No se ceden o comunican datos a terceros para prestar este servicio. El Titular ha contratado los servicios de alojamiento web a Banahosting que actúa como encargado de tratamiento.
  • Derechos: Acceder, rectificar y suprimir los datos.
  • Información Adicional: Puede consultar la información detallada en la Política de Privacidad.

Trending

Exit mobile version