Connect with us

NFTs

How to transfer NFTs from OpenSea to MetaMask – TradingView News

TokenTalk Staff

Published

on

Meme Coin Price Drop Continues, Data Says - TradingView News

Non-fungible tokens (NFTs) have emerged as a notable feature of the Web3 world, providing exclusive ownership of digital assets. OpenSea stands as a preeminent hub for all things NFTs, facilitating buying, selling, and trading, while MetaMask serves as a preferred cryptocurrency wallet and entry point into the decentralized world.

If you want to oversee your NFTs purchased through the OpenSea marketplace through MetaMask, below is a detailed step-by-step guide on how to transfer them.

A step-by-step guide to transferring an NFT from OpenSea to MetaMask

Follow this step-by-step guide to easily transfer your NFTs from OpenSea to MetaMask.

Step 1: Install and configure MetaMask

Start by installing the MetaMask browser extension or mobile app if you haven’t already. Go to metamask.io and follow the instructions to create a new wallet or import an existing one. Make sure your MetaMask wallet is connected to the Ethereum mainnet and has some Ether (ETH).

Step 2: Access OpenSea and log in

Navigate to the OpenSea website and log into your OpenSea account with the MetaMask browser extension. Once logged in, access your profile by clicking on your username, which is located in the top right corner of the screen.Cointelegraph

Step 3: Review your NFT collection and identify the NFT you want to transfer

On your profile page, you will find a compilation of the NFTs you own. Identify the specific NFT you intend to transfer to MetaMask. On the item card, located in the lower left corner, click the three-dot menu icon. From the drop-down menu, select “Transfer”.Cointelegraph

Alternatively, you can transfer an NFT directly from the item page. Find an NFT you want to transfer by clicking its thumbnail or title. Look for the arrow-shaped transfer button positioned in the top right corner.Cointelegraph

Step 4: Start the transfer

On the item card or detailed page of your chosen NFT, locate and click the “Transfer” button to begin the transfer process.Cointelegraph

Step 5: Enter your MetaMask wallet address

In the field provided, enter the recipient’s wallet address. Additionally, Ethereum Name Service (ENS) domains are also accepted, offering an alternative method for specifying the recipient’s wallet.

Step 6: Check transfer details

Before finalizing the transfer, carefully review transaction details such as the recipient’s address and the intended NFT for transfer. After ensuring the accuracy of these details, click the “Transfer” button to proceed.

Remember that it is crucial to exercise caution and meticulously check all transaction details when transferring NFTs or any digital assets between wallets. This diligence ensures a seamless and secure transfer process.Cointelegraph

Step 7: Confirm the transfer on MetaMask

You will receive a request to approve the blockchain transfer from your wallet. Navigate back to the MetaMask wallet tab or window. Look for a notification or pending transaction in your wallet interface. Review the details provided and confirm the transaction by approving asset portability.Cointelegraph

Step 8: Wait for confirmation

Patience is key while you wait for the Ethereum blockchain to process the transaction. The duration may vary depending on network congestion, but typically takes a few minutes.

Step 9: View transaction confirmation

You will receive a confirmation message once the item has been transferred successfully. Additionally, you can view the transaction confirmation on a preferred block explorer – for example, Etherscan – by clicking “View Transaction”.

How to view your NFTs on MetaMask

Discovering your NFTs on MetaMask is very easy once the token migration is complete. When logging into your MetaMask wallet, go to the section designated “NFTs”, which is specifically designed to showcase your unique digital assets, providing easy access for exploration and interaction.Cointelegraph

In the “NFTs” area, the transferred NFT will be displayed prominently next to any others you own. MetaMask’s intuitive interface simplifies the process of finding your transferred NFT, ensuring it is readily accessible for your convenience.

With your NFT now integrated with MetaMask, you have full control over managing your NFT along with your other digital assets. Whether you are considering investment strategies, planning future transactions, or simply admiring your collection, MetaMask offers a suitable platform for overseeing your NFT portfolio within the decentralized ecosystem.

OpenSea to MetaMask throughput

When transferring your NFTs from OpenSea wallets to MetaMask, it is essential to consider the associated asset transaction fees. These fees serve as tolls along the decentralized transaction highway, ensuring the smooth flow of assets across the blockchain.

Before starting the transfer, take a moment to familiarize yourself with the fee structure. OpenSea, a busy marketplace, typically charges a nominal gas fee to initiate and facilitate the transfer of your NFTs to your chosen wallet. These fees vary depending on the current congestion of the Ethereum network and the complexity of the transaction. Typically, these charges range between $10 and $20.

Reducing NFT Transfer Fees Using Layer 2 Networks

To reduce excessive transaction costs on the Ethereum mainnet, users can utilize layer 2 (L2) solutions such as Polygon and Optimism, which are compatible with MetaMask. These L2 solutions aggregate and process transactions from the main Ethereum blockchain into their respective L2 networks. This strategy minimizes the number of transactions the mainnet needs to manage, resulting in less network congestion and lower fees.

To add the Polygon network to MetaMask, navigate to the settings menu, select the “Networks” section and provide the following information:

  • RPC URL: https://polygon-rpc.com
  • Symbol: MATIC
  • Chain ID: 137

To add the Optimism network to MetaMask, use the details below:

  • RPC URL: https://mainnet.optimism.io
  • Symbol: ETH
  • Chain ID: 10

After adding the desired network, the process of directly sending NFTs from OpenSea to a Polygon or Optimism address typically involves:

  • Ensure your MetaMask wallet is connected to the OpenSea website and has the Polygon or Optimism networks added.
  • Select the NFT(s) to transfer from your OpenSea account.
  • Click the “Transfer” button and enter the recipient’s Polygon or Optimism address into your MetaMask wallet.
  • Approve the transaction and pay the associated gas fees (which are generally much lower on L2 networks).

However, it is important to note that not all NFTs on OpenSea may be available for direct transfer to L2 networks. Users should check the NFT details to see if it is compatible and should always double-check the recipient’s address before confirming the transfer.

Once the transfer is complete, switch MetaMask to the Polygon or Optimism network to view your NFTs in the “NFTs” section of your wallet.

Benefits of Transferring NFTs to Crypto Wallets

Transferring NFTs from specialized markets to crypto wallets serves several important purposes, offering several advantages to NFT owners.

Firstly, moving NFTs to a personal crypto wallet benefits owners with enhanced security measures since crypto wallets utilize advanced encryption techniques and private keys.

Secondly, withdrawing NFTs to a wallet guarantees full ownership and control over the tokenized assets. Unlike centralized markets where platforms maintain custody, storing NFTs in a personal wallet grants owners exclusive access and authority over their assets. MetaMask is a popular non-custodial wallet, meaning users have sole digital ownership of their private keys and full control over their crypto items without relying on NFT aggregators.

Furthermore, crypto wallets are optimized for long-term asset storage. Transferring NFTs to a wallet allows their owners to store their assets securely for long periods without depending on the continuity of the market platform. Transferring an NFT to MetaMask reduces the possibility of loss, unauthorized access, or hacking compared to leaving it on a marketplace like OpenSea.

Furthermore, centralized NFT solutions may be susceptible to various risks, such as regulatory changes or technical issues. By transferring NFTs to a personal crypto wallet, owners reduce their exposure to such risks and ensure continued access to their assets.

Additionally, some NFTs are designed to work across multiple platforms and applications. By transferring them to a crypto wallet, owners can seamlessly integrate these assets with various decentralized applications (DApps), gaming platforms or virtual worlds that support specific NFT standards.

Wallets like MetaMask are compatible with most DApps and blockchain networks, allowing users to seamlessly interact with their NFTs across different platforms and ecosystems. Additionally, decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms offer diverse opportunities for NFT holders, such as using NFTs as collateral for loans or earning yield through staking.

And last but not least, as cryptocurrency wallets typically provide advanced features for managing NFT portfolios, including performance tracking and NFT transaction history, migrating digital assets to a wallet streamlines portfolio management and analysis .

Can MetaMask wallet be hacked?

Like any other digital tool, MetaMask is susceptible to security risks. Hackers can impersonate legitimate communications or develop fake extensions to trick users into revealing sensitive information. Relying solely on passwords to protect MetaMask accounts can be a mistake. Without two-factor authentication (2FA), assets held in MetaMask can be vulnerable.

Using MetaMask on compromised devices or browsers may expose users to significant risks. Hackers may try to access your device through malware or exploit vulnerabilities in the wallet’s functionality. Lack of user awareness is often the reason for hacking incidents. Users may unknowingly download malicious extensions or fall victim to phishing attacks, making their assets vulnerable to theft. If the user does not take proactive measures, they may fall victim to hacking attempts.

Regardless of the technology, the human element in security breaches cannot be overlooked. Hackers are known to use social engineering tactics, such as contacting users under false pretenses. Users who fail to realize this may face significant losses.

Fuente

We are the editorial team of TokenTalk, where seriousness meets clarity in cryptocurrency analysis. With a robust team of finance and blockchain technology experts, we are dedicated to meticulously exploring complex crypto markets with detailed assessments and an unbiased approach. Our mission is to democratize access to knowledge of emerging financial technologies, ensuring they are understandable and accessible to all. In every article on TokenTalk, we strive to provide content that not only educates, but also empowers our readers, facilitating their integration into the financial digital age.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Información básica sobre protección de datos Ver más

  • Responsable: Miguel Mamador.
  • Finalidad:  Moderar los comentarios.
  • Legitimación:  Por consentimiento del interesado.
  • Destinatarios y encargados de tratamiento:  No se ceden o comunican datos a terceros para prestar este servicio. El Titular ha contratado los servicios de alojamiento web a Banahosting que actúa como encargado de tratamiento.
  • Derechos: Acceder, rectificar y suprimir los datos.
  • Información Adicional: Puede consultar la información detallada en la Política de Privacidad.

NFTs

RTFKT Announces Project Animus Reveal, Launches Egg Unboxing Event Amid Mixed Reactions | NFT CULTURE | NFT News | Web3 Culture

TokenTalk Staff

Published

on

RTFKT Announces Project Animus Reveal, Launches Egg Unboxing Event Amid Mixed Reactions | NFT CULTURE | NFT News | Web3 Culture

RTFKT, the innovative creator-led company renowned for its cutting-edge sneakers and metaverse collectibles, has officially unveiled its highly anticipated collection, Project Animus. This project marks a significant milestone in RTFKT’s journey, introducing a new dimension to its digital universe after a long period of development. However, the initial market response has been disappointing, with the revealed Animi trading at a floor price of 0.05 ETH, significantly lower than the eggs’ floor price of 0.09 ETH.

The Genesis of the Project Animus

Initially introduced in October 2022, Project Animus introduces a unique ecosystem of digital creatures called Animi. These Animi are designed to enhance Clone X’s avatars, offering an immersive and engaging experience for the community. The recent reveal showcased a diverse range of Animi species, each with distinct design traits and elemental attributes, breaking away from traditional trait-based rarity systems.

A New Digital Frontier: The History and Evolution of Project Animus

The Animus Project is RTFKT’s latest intellectual property, promising to revolutionize the NFT space with its unique digital creatures. The journey kicked off on October 8, 2022, with an interactive teaser event called “The Eggsperience.” This livestream event allowed attendees to explore a virtual Animus Research Facility, generating intrigue and excitement among the community.

Renowned artist Takashi Murakami played a significant role in the project, revealing the first Murakami-themed Animus creature, Saisei, on April 30, 2023. This collaboration added a layer of artistic prestige to the project, further elevating its status within the NFT community.

Animus Egg Incubation: A Journey from Egg to Animi

Clone X NFT holders had the opportunity to claim an Animus Egg until March 1, 2024. This was followed by the Animus Egg Hatching event, which ran from May 7 to June 4, 2024. During this period, holders of several RTFKT NFTs, including Clone X, Space Pod, Loot Pod, Exo Pod, and Lux ​​Pod, were able to use a points-based system to increase their chances of hatching rarer Animi. The limited supply of Project Animus Eggs is capped at 20,000, with no public sale planned.

Mixed market reception

Despite the excitement and innovative features, the market reaction to the reveal of Project Animus has been lukewarm. Animi is currently trading at a floor price of 0.05 ETH, significantly lower than the eggs’ floor price of 0.09 ETH. This discrepancy has led to disappointment among some collectors who had high expectations for the project.

What Awaits Us: The Future of Project Animus

Following the reveal, RTFKT plans to release a collection of exclusive Animus Artist Edition characters. Holders of Clone X Artist Edition NFTs are guaranteed to get one of these special editions. The distribution will include 88 Special Edition Animus, with 8 Mythic (Dragon Sakura), 40 Shiny, and 40 Ghost Animus. The odds of receiving a Special Edition Animus are the same for all Eggs hatched, regardless of the points accumulated.

The remaining Animus characters will be distributed among unhatched Eggs, encompassing Special Edition Animus, as well as Cosmic Animus and Murakami Element from Generation 1, Generation 2, and Generation 3.

Conclusion

RTFKT’s Project Animus represents a bold step forward in the NFT space, combining cutting-edge technology with artistic collaboration to create an immersive and innovative digital ecosystem. However, the initial market reception highlights the challenges of living up to high expectations in the ever-evolving NFT landscape. As the project continues to evolve, it promises to deliver unique experiences and opportunities for its community, solidifying RTFKT’s position as a leader in the metaverse and digital collectibles arena.

Summary: RTFKT has unveiled Project Animus, introducing a unique ecosystem of digital creatures called Animi designed to enhance Clone X avatars. Despite the excitement, market response has been mixed, with Animi trading at a lower floor price than eggs. The project kicked off with an interactive event in October 2022, featuring collaborations with artist Takashi Murakami. Following the reveal, RTFKT will release special edition Animus characters. The total supply of Animus Eggs is limited to 20,000, with no public sale planned.

Fuente

Continue Reading

NFTs

The Olympics have reportedly ditched Mario and Sonic games in favor of mobile and NFTs

TokenTalk Staff

Published

on

The Olympics have reportedly ditched Mario and Sonic games in favor of mobile and NFTs

The long and historic partnership between Nintendo and Sega to create video games for the Olympics reportedly ended in 2020 as event organizers sought opportunities elsewhere.

Lee Cocker, who served as executive producer on several Mario & Sonic Olympics titles, said Eurogamer the International Olympic Committee let the licensing agreement lapse because it “wanted to look at other partners, NFTs and esports.”

“Basically, the IOC wanted to bring [it] “Turn inward and look for other partners so you can get more money,” Cocker added.

The 2024 Summer Olympics kicked off in Paris last week, but there were no Mario & Sonic games available in time for the event to begin – the first time this has happened since the original release in 2007 to coincide with the 2008 Beijing Summer Olympics.

Over the past two decades, there have been four Mario and Sonic adaptations for the Summer Olympics, as well as two for the Winter Olympics.

This year, instead of a Nintendo/Sega title, the IOC released Olympics Go! Paris 2024, a free-to-play mobile and PC title developed by nWay, which has worked on several Power Rangers games.

Olympics Go! allows players to compete in 12 sports and unlock NFTs from the Paris 2024 digital pin collection.

The original Mario & Sonic at the Olympic Games was announced in March 2007 and marked the first time the two mascots – once archrivals in the console wars of the 1990s – appeared together in a game.



Fuente

Continue Reading

NFTs

DraftKings abruptly shuts down NFT operation, leaving collectors panicking over vast holdings of digital tokens

TokenTalk Staff

Published

on

DraftKings abruptly shuts down NFT operation, leaving collectors panicking over vast holdings of digital tokens

DraftKings, the daily fantasy sports and sports betting company, abruptly shut down a program called Reignmakers on Tuesday, posting a notice on its website and associated app and sending a mass email to some subset of its user base. Reignmakers, which the company launched in 2021, offered pay-to-play competitions in NFL football, PGA Tour golf and UFC mixed martial arts. The decision to eliminate the entire program, DraftKings says, was not made lightly but was forced “due to recent legal developments.”

DraftKings has yet to specify what “recent legal developments” are troubling its now-dead Reignmakers product. The company was sued in U.S. District Court in 2023 by a Reignmakers player named Justin Dufoe, who accuses the company of dealing in unregistered securities, taking advantage of relatively unsophisticated “retail investors,” and failing to market and support Reignmakers to the degree necessary to return to its users the financial benefits expected. DraftKings filed a motion in September to dismiss Dufoe’s complaint, but that motion was denied on July 2. A scheduling conference was held by the parties on July 29; Reignmakers was permanently shut down on July 30. A DraftKings spokesperson reached by Defector on Wednesday declined to confirm whether Dufoe’s complaint is the “recent legal development” that forced the company’s hand.

Users of the Reignmakers NFL product, who in recent days began murmuring on social channels about a notable lack of DraftKings activity so close to the start of the NFL preseason schedule, were caught off guard and, in some cases, devastated by the news. Members of the DraftKings Discord server, where all Reignmakers-related channels were abruptly shut down and locked following the announcement, flooded a general channel in various states of panic, sharing news, theorizing, lamenting, and, in some cases, openly worrying about whether it would be possible to recoup any decent fraction of the genuinely impressive sums of money they had invested in this DraftKings product.

Reignmakers is nominally a daily fantasy contest—users build lineups of players and then pit those lineups against other users’ lineups for cash prizes—but it’s actually a distributor of nonfungible digital tokens (NFTs), originated and sold by DraftKings, and then frequently resold on a dedicated secondary marketplace also hosted by DraftKings. At the lineup-building level, Reignmakers functions like a card-collecting game, with artificial scarcity driving the prices of the most coveted cards to insane, eye-popping heights. Reignmakers NFTs are tiered and offered in timed drops designed to heighten the sense of scarcity. A user can enter a lower-tier contest using a collection of NFTs that may have cost a few hundred dollars in total (or that were earned by purchasing random packs of NFTs that offer generally low odds of scoring top assets) and throw their lot in with hundreds of casual users competing for relatively unimpressive rewards. Random packs at the lowest tier would have prices as low as a few dollars; mid-tier cards—Star and Elite tiers, I’d guess—could cost a player upwards of $1,000.

But players interested in hunting down the biggest payouts, not just from games but from leaderboard prizes and other assorted prizes, would need to enter higher-tier games, and to enter the higher-tier games, a user’s collection needed to include higher-tier NFTs. DraftKings ensured that these cards were extremely scarce and could only be purchased directly on the marketplace at prices that any reasonable person would consider utterly insane.

For example, the highest-tier Reignmaker contests (called the Reignmakers tier, of course) have in the past been limited to listings with at least two of the highest-tier, rarest NFTs (also the Reignmaker tier) plus three NFTs from the second-highest tier (Legendary). NFTs at these tiers are expensive. Not just expensive in the way that, like, a steak dinner is expensive, but expensive in the way that buying even one of them should trigger a mandatory visit to a gambling addiction counselor, if not sirens and a straitjacket. Back in 2022a Reignmaker-level Ja’Marr Chase NFT from something called the Field Pass Promo Set could be purchased directly from the DraftKings Reignmaker Marketplace for a whopping $32,100.

Screenshot via YouTube

Reignmakers users purchased NFTs at various levels with the expectation that owning them would convey better odds of winning contests hosted on DraftKings. This was the gamification element of Reignmakers, which emerged several months after DraftKings began trading and minting its NFTs. But as with all NFTs, a very large part of the real appeal for its buyers was the expectation, however insane, that these worthless, virtually worthless, infinitely duplicable digital images would increase in value over time. Now that both the Reignmakers game and the Reignmakers marketplace have been shut down, Reignmakers NFT holders are worried that their investments may have suddenly lost all monetary value. One Discord user described Tuesday as “a bad day to wake up and realize you have $2,000 worth of unopened NFL Rookie Packs”; Another user asked the group if they should expect “a refund” on the $10,000 they’ve already spent on Reignmakers NFTs this year. A pessimistic Reddit user posted tuesday that they would sue DraftKings if they were forced to take a total loss on a Reignmakers NFT collection worth approximately $100,000.

The game (scam?) was built to make numbers like these not only possible, but somewhat easily achievable. A user who intended to compete from a position of strength in multiple overlapping high-profile contests at the same time, and who had been in the blockchain madhouse for a period of years, could easily have spent six figures on Reignmakers NFTs. DraftKings used non-gaming incentives to entice players to spend more and more money, much like casinos give away free suites to players who over-bet on blackjack. Another Reddit user lamented the loss of the additional prizes and ranking bonuses he had hoped to earn in the upcoming NFL season by having a portfolio of NFTs that had reached the highest levels of value and prestige. “I was already loaded up on 2024 creation tokens and rookie debut cards,” said this Reignmakers userwho claimed his portfolio was finally “close to the top 250 overall.”

Dufoe’s complaint says the NFTs minted by DraftKings for Reignmakers qualify as securities, function like securities, and should be regulated as securities. In its motion to dismiss, DraftKings attempted to position its NFTs as game pieces — eye-wateringly expensive, yes, but essentially the same thing as Magic: The Gathering cards or Monopoly hotels. The court, in resolving these arguments, applied what’s known as “the Howey test,” referencing a case from 1946 in which the U.S. Supreme Court established a standard for determining whether a specific instrument qualifies as an investment contract. Judge Dennis J. Casper, in ruling against DraftKings’ motion, concluded that Dufoe could plausibly argue that Reignmakers’ NFT transactions represent “the pooling of assets from multiple investors in such a manner that all share in the profits and risks of the enterprise,” arguing that DraftKings’ absolute control over the game and marketplace effectively binds the financial interests of the company and the buyers, the latter of whom depend on the viability of both for their NFTs to retain any value.

Reignmakers users are different from Monopoly players in at least one crucial way: A person who buys a Monopoly board has no expectation from Hasbro that those little red and green pieces will appreciate in value. It’s a game! No matter what any hysterically conflicted party may say to the contrary, that’s not what NFT collecting is. DraftKings had been selling Reignmakers NFTs for months before they were gamified, and Dufoe, in his complaint, cites public comments made by DraftKings spokespeople that seem to explicitly position Reignmakers NFTs as assets with independent monetary value beyond their utility in Reignmakers contests. Judge Casper, in his ruling on the motion to dismiss, cites a Twitter account associated with a podcast run by DraftKings CEO Matthew Kalish, who in a tweet described NFTs as “the opportunity to invest in startups, artists, operations, and entrepreneurs all at once.” This is probably the kind of thing that NFT peddlers should stop saying. This advice assumes, of course, that NFTs will continue to exist as instruments on the other side of this and other lawsuits.

DraftKings has posted a worryingly sparse FAQ at the bottom of the your ad Tuesday, anticipating but largely failing to address questions from players who see this as yet another in a long line of brutal blockchain rug pulls. In a hilarious reversal of existing Reignmakers policy, Reignmakers users are now allowed by DraftKings to withdraw their Reignmakers NFTs from their DraftKings portfolios and into their personal NFT wallets, where those NFTs will have precisely zero value, to anyone, for the rest of all time. There’s also vague language about Reignmakers users having the option to “relinquish” their NFTs back to DraftKings in exchange for “cash payments,” subject to “certain conditions” and according to an as-yet-unspecified formula that will take into account, among other things, the “size and quality” of a player’s collection.

Reignmakers users are not optimistic. Those who claim to have been victims of other blockchain market crashes are warning their peers on Discord and Reddit to expect payouts that amount to pennies on the dollar; in the absence of any clarifying information, users are unsure whether cashing out their NFTs from Reignmakers to their personal NFT wallets, for reasons that completely pass any and all understanding, would effectively preclude the possibility of delivering these silly digital tokens back to DraftKings. It remains to be seen what exactly DraftKings has in mind with the “certain conditions” attached to the delivery process. There is much that has yet to be resolved. A DraftKings spokesperson contacted by Defector indicated that more time would be needed to answer a list of specific questions and issued a statement noting that it is “in DraftKings’ DNA to innovate and disrupt to provide the best possible gaming experiences for our customers.” The original complaint is embedded below.

Do you know anything about the demise of Reignmakers, either from the consumer side or from the DraftKings side? We’d love to hear from you. Get it in touch!

Recommended

Fuente

Continue Reading

NFTs

There Will Be No More ‘Mario & Sonic’ Olympics Because of NFTs

TokenTalk Staff

Published

on

There Will Be No More 'Mario & Sonic' Olympics Because of NFTs

Nintendo and SEGA have been teaming up with the Olympics for several years now in the popular Mario & sonic in the Olympic Games series, but a new report claims the International Olympic Committee has abandoned the series in favor of new deals in eSports and NFTs.

According to Eurogamer“A veteran behind the series,” Lee Cocker, told the outlet that the IOC chose not to renew its license with SEGA and Nintendo, letting it expire in 2020. “They wanted to look at other partners and NFTs and eSports,” Cocker told Eurogamer. “Basically, the IOC wanted to bring [it] turn inward and look for other partners so they could get more money.”

Mario & Sonic at the Olympic Games is a series that has been running since 2008, with six main games covering the regular and Winter Olympics. In the games, players could control various characters from the Mario and Sonic franchises and compete in Olympic sporting events.

It’s no secret that NFTs are a big part of this year’s Paris 2024 Olympics. Olympics Go! Paris 2024 is a mobile and mobile-connected game your site states that players can “join the excitement of the Paris 2024 Olympic Games with nWay’s officially licensed, commemorative NFT Digital Pins collection honoring Paris 2024!”

As for eSports, Saudi Arabia will host the ESports Olympic Games in 2025. This is part of a partnership with the Saudi National Olympic Committee (NOC) that is expected to last for the next 12 years and is expected to feature regular events.

IOC President Thomas Bach said: “By partnering with the Saudi NOC, we also ensure that Olympic values ​​are respected, in particular with regard to the game titles on the programme, the promotion of gender equality and the engagement with young audiences who are embracing esports.”

In other news, Someone claimed they’re suing Bandai Namco because Elden Ring is too difficult.



Fuente

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2024 TOKENTALK.TOP. All rights reserved. This website provides educational content and highlights that investing involves risks. It is essential to conduct thorough research before investing and to be prepared to assume potential losses. Be sure to fully understand the risks involved before making investment decisions. Important: We do not provide financial or investment advice. All content is presented for educational purposes only.