NFTs
Why Solana’s New Token Extensions Are a ‘Game Changer’ for NFTs – DL News
![Why Solana's New Token Extensions Are a 'Game Changer' for NFTs – DL News](https://tokentalk.top/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/Why-Solanas-New-Token-Extensions-Are-a-Game-Changer-for.jpg)
- A new token extension allows Solana developers to natively embed metadata into NFTs.
- The development disrupts Metaplex’s monopoly, says a Solana infrastructure developer.
- The new token extensions could help Solana’s NFTs catch up to those on other blockchains like Ethereum.
Solana recently launched 13 new token extensions that bring a host of new features for developers to build on.
In developer circles, one of these new features is generating significant excitement: the ability to natively embed metadata into Solana NFTs.
Metadata is an essential tool in blockchain protocols. Among other things, it allows additional information — such as images and characteristics — to be attributed to NFTs.
Previously, Solana tokens only had the ability to include minimal metadata, such as the supply of a given token.
Solana’s new token extensions enable a generic metadata interface, not affiliated with any interested party. Developers can now create their own custom NFT standards, enabling more competition and innovation within the Solana NFT ecosystem.
It didn’t take long for developers to make use of this new ability.
Ming Ng, a developer working on the popular Solana decentralized exchange aggregator Jupiter, has already released a new Solana NFT token standard in collaboration with NFT fractionalization protocol Ovols.
A Metaplex monopoly?
Since there was previously no way to natively attach more metadata to Solana NFTs, companies independent of Solana created their own solutions.
Join the community to receive our latest stories and updates
Metaplex, a protocol that allows the creation and minting of NFTs, was the biggest of these. It allows Solana developers to attach additional metadata to tokens. Due to the high costs of doing so, many NFT creators have chosen not to build their own metadata protocols and have instead chosen to use Metaplex.
Although much of Solana’s history $4.8 billion NFT market would not exist without Metaplex, this situation was not a good long-term solution, according to Mert Mumtaz, CEO of infrastructure provider Solana Helius Labs.
“A single, centralized, for-profit entity – Metaplex – has a complete monopoly on the NFT standard on Solana right now,” said Mumtaz DL News. “Lack of competition leads to lack of innovation.”
Nhan Phan, co-founder and CTO of Metaplex Studios, a for-profit company that uses the Metaplex protocol in its products, said DL News that Metaplex has “never been a monopoly” and that there have been several NFT standards alongside Metaplex’s that have been released in the past.
The Metaplex protocol is owned and maintained by the Metaplex Foundation, a non-profit entity. Although the Metaplex protocol code is open source, those who use it cannot withdraw its mandatory fees.
“Our focus has always been to innovate and revolutionize ourselves – for example, with compression – and this is what has kept us as the preferred option for digital asset developers,” said Phan.
One September 2022 White paper published by the Metaplex Foundation claims that its protocol has been used to mint over 20 million NFTs, representing over 99.9% of the Solana NFT market.
Phan also said that the Metaplex protocol includes more than just a metadata extension, and also provides Solana NFT tools, as well as on-chain NFT collection launches and on-chain NFT data storage.
‘There is a lot to improve’
With the ability to include NFT metadata natively, Solana’s NFT ecosystem can now keep up with that of other networks like Ethereum, where several distinct NFT standards such as ERC721, ERC1155 and most recently ERC404gained popularity.
“The new token extension is a game changer for Solana NFTs,” said a spokesperson for NFT marketplace Magic Eden. DL News. Magic Eden said the new metadata interface will empower builders and allow them to easily innovate with new token standards.
One way to do this is by combining the Metadata extension with the Transfer Hook extension. This would allow NFTs to run custom logic when they are transferred and could be used to create permissioned tokens or NFTs that automatically distribute royalties.
Magic Eden isn’t alone in highlighting the power of token extensions.
“There is a lot to be improved regarding Solana NFTs,” said Armani Ferrante, creator of the Mad Lads NFT project and the Backpack NFT exchange. DL News.
Ferrante said the new token extensions will make it easier to explore “important features like royalty enforcement” and that Backpack plans to support the new standards.
The application of NFT royalties – a small portion of each NFT sale sent to their creators – has historically been a controversial issue.
Some markets, like OpenSea, ended up choosing do not impose royalties for NFTs sold on the platform due to other popular NFT marketplaces that make royalties optional.
Some NFT collectors argue that not enforcing royalties harms NFT creators and prevents them from generating a steady stream of income from their work.
Update, February 13th: This article has been amended to clarify the differences between the Metaplex protocol, the Metaplex Foundation and Metaplex Studios.
Tim Craig is DeFi correspondent for DL News in Edinburgh. Get in touch with tips at tim@dlnews.com.
NFTs
RTFKT Announces Project Animus Reveal, Launches Egg Unboxing Event Amid Mixed Reactions | NFT CULTURE | NFT News | Web3 Culture
![RTFKT Announces Project Animus Reveal, Launches Egg Unboxing Event Amid Mixed Reactions | NFT CULTURE | NFT News | Web3 Culture](https://tokentalk.top/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/RTFKT-Announces-Project-Animus-Reveal-Launches-Egg-Unboxing-Event-Amid.png)
RTFKT, the innovative creator-led company renowned for its cutting-edge sneakers and metaverse collectibles, has officially unveiled its highly anticipated collection, Project Animus. This project marks a significant milestone in RTFKT’s journey, introducing a new dimension to its digital universe after a long period of development. However, the initial market response has been disappointing, with the revealed Animi trading at a floor price of 0.05 ETH, significantly lower than the eggs’ floor price of 0.09 ETH.
The Genesis of the Project Animus
Initially introduced in October 2022, Project Animus introduces a unique ecosystem of digital creatures called Animi. These Animi are designed to enhance Clone X’s avatars, offering an immersive and engaging experience for the community. The recent reveal showcased a diverse range of Animi species, each with distinct design traits and elemental attributes, breaking away from traditional trait-based rarity systems.
A New Digital Frontier: The History and Evolution of Project Animus
The Animus Project is RTFKT’s latest intellectual property, promising to revolutionize the NFT space with its unique digital creatures. The journey kicked off on October 8, 2022, with an interactive teaser event called “The Eggsperience.” This livestream event allowed attendees to explore a virtual Animus Research Facility, generating intrigue and excitement among the community.
Renowned artist Takashi Murakami played a significant role in the project, revealing the first Murakami-themed Animus creature, Saisei, on April 30, 2023. This collaboration added a layer of artistic prestige to the project, further elevating its status within the NFT community.
Animus Egg Incubation: A Journey from Egg to Animi
Clone X NFT holders had the opportunity to claim an Animus Egg until March 1, 2024. This was followed by the Animus Egg Hatching event, which ran from May 7 to June 4, 2024. During this period, holders of several RTFKT NFTs, including Clone X, Space Pod, Loot Pod, Exo Pod, and Lux Pod, were able to use a points-based system to increase their chances of hatching rarer Animi. The limited supply of Project Animus Eggs is capped at 20,000, with no public sale planned.
Mixed market reception
Despite the excitement and innovative features, the market reaction to the reveal of Project Animus has been lukewarm. Animi is currently trading at a floor price of 0.05 ETH, significantly lower than the eggs’ floor price of 0.09 ETH. This discrepancy has led to disappointment among some collectors who had high expectations for the project.
What Awaits Us: The Future of Project Animus
Following the reveal, RTFKT plans to release a collection of exclusive Animus Artist Edition characters. Holders of Clone X Artist Edition NFTs are guaranteed to get one of these special editions. The distribution will include 88 Special Edition Animus, with 8 Mythic (Dragon Sakura), 40 Shiny, and 40 Ghost Animus. The odds of receiving a Special Edition Animus are the same for all Eggs hatched, regardless of the points accumulated.
The remaining Animus characters will be distributed among unhatched Eggs, encompassing Special Edition Animus, as well as Cosmic Animus and Murakami Element from Generation 1, Generation 2, and Generation 3.
Conclusion
RTFKT’s Project Animus represents a bold step forward in the NFT space, combining cutting-edge technology with artistic collaboration to create an immersive and innovative digital ecosystem. However, the initial market reception highlights the challenges of living up to high expectations in the ever-evolving NFT landscape. As the project continues to evolve, it promises to deliver unique experiences and opportunities for its community, solidifying RTFKT’s position as a leader in the metaverse and digital collectibles arena.
Summary: RTFKT has unveiled Project Animus, introducing a unique ecosystem of digital creatures called Animi designed to enhance Clone X avatars. Despite the excitement, market response has been mixed, with Animi trading at a lower floor price than eggs. The project kicked off with an interactive event in October 2022, featuring collaborations with artist Takashi Murakami. Following the reveal, RTFKT will release special edition Animus characters. The total supply of Animus Eggs is limited to 20,000, with no public sale planned.
NFTs
The Olympics have reportedly ditched Mario and Sonic games in favor of mobile and NFTs
![The Olympics have reportedly ditched Mario and Sonic games in favor of mobile and NFTs](https://tokentalk.top/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/The-Olympics-have-reportedly-ditched-Mario-and-Sonic-games-in.jpg)
The long and historic partnership between Nintendo and Sega to create video games for the Olympics reportedly ended in 2020 as event organizers sought opportunities elsewhere.
Lee Cocker, who served as executive producer on several Mario & Sonic Olympics titles, said Eurogamer the International Olympic Committee let the licensing agreement lapse because it “wanted to look at other partners, NFTs and esports.”
“Basically, the IOC wanted to bring [it] “Turn inward and look for other partners so you can get more money,” Cocker added.
The 2024 Summer Olympics kicked off in Paris last week, but there were no Mario & Sonic games available in time for the event to begin – the first time this has happened since the original release in 2007 to coincide with the 2008 Beijing Summer Olympics.
Over the past two decades, there have been four Mario and Sonic adaptations for the Summer Olympics, as well as two for the Winter Olympics.
This year, instead of a Nintendo/Sega title, the IOC released Olympics Go! Paris 2024, a free-to-play mobile and PC title developed by nWay, which has worked on several Power Rangers games.
Olympics Go! allows players to compete in 12 sports and unlock NFTs from the Paris 2024 digital pin collection.
The original Mario & Sonic at the Olympic Games was announced in March 2007 and marked the first time the two mascots – once archrivals in the console wars of the 1990s – appeared together in a game.
NFTs
DraftKings abruptly shuts down NFT operation, leaving collectors panicking over vast holdings of digital tokens
![DraftKings abruptly shuts down NFT operation, leaving collectors panicking over vast holdings of digital tokens](https://tokentalk.top/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/1722519910_DraftKings-abruptly-shuts-down-NFT-operation-leaving-collectors-panicking-over.png)
DraftKings, the daily fantasy sports and sports betting company, abruptly shut down a program called Reignmakers on Tuesday, posting a notice on its website and associated app and sending a mass email to some subset of its user base. Reignmakers, which the company launched in 2021, offered pay-to-play competitions in NFL football, PGA Tour golf and UFC mixed martial arts. The decision to eliminate the entire program, DraftKings says, was not made lightly but was forced “due to recent legal developments.”
DraftKings has yet to specify what “recent legal developments” are troubling its now-dead Reignmakers product. The company was sued in U.S. District Court in 2023 by a Reignmakers player named Justin Dufoe, who accuses the company of dealing in unregistered securities, taking advantage of relatively unsophisticated “retail investors,” and failing to market and support Reignmakers to the degree necessary to return to its users the financial benefits expected. DraftKings filed a motion in September to dismiss Dufoe’s complaint, but that motion was denied on July 2. A scheduling conference was held by the parties on July 29; Reignmakers was permanently shut down on July 30. A DraftKings spokesperson reached by Defector on Wednesday declined to confirm whether Dufoe’s complaint is the “recent legal development” that forced the company’s hand.
Users of the Reignmakers NFL product, who in recent days began murmuring on social channels about a notable lack of DraftKings activity so close to the start of the NFL preseason schedule, were caught off guard and, in some cases, devastated by the news. Members of the DraftKings Discord server, where all Reignmakers-related channels were abruptly shut down and locked following the announcement, flooded a general channel in various states of panic, sharing news, theorizing, lamenting, and, in some cases, openly worrying about whether it would be possible to recoup any decent fraction of the genuinely impressive sums of money they had invested in this DraftKings product.
Reignmakers is nominally a daily fantasy contest—users build lineups of players and then pit those lineups against other users’ lineups for cash prizes—but it’s actually a distributor of nonfungible digital tokens (NFTs), originated and sold by DraftKings, and then frequently resold on a dedicated secondary marketplace also hosted by DraftKings. At the lineup-building level, Reignmakers functions like a card-collecting game, with artificial scarcity driving the prices of the most coveted cards to insane, eye-popping heights. Reignmakers NFTs are tiered and offered in timed drops designed to heighten the sense of scarcity. A user can enter a lower-tier contest using a collection of NFTs that may have cost a few hundred dollars in total (or that were earned by purchasing random packs of NFTs that offer generally low odds of scoring top assets) and throw their lot in with hundreds of casual users competing for relatively unimpressive rewards. Random packs at the lowest tier would have prices as low as a few dollars; mid-tier cards—Star and Elite tiers, I’d guess—could cost a player upwards of $1,000.
But players interested in hunting down the biggest payouts, not just from games but from leaderboard prizes and other assorted prizes, would need to enter higher-tier games, and to enter the higher-tier games, a user’s collection needed to include higher-tier NFTs. DraftKings ensured that these cards were extremely scarce and could only be purchased directly on the marketplace at prices that any reasonable person would consider utterly insane.
For example, the highest-tier Reignmaker contests (called the Reignmakers tier, of course) have in the past been limited to listings with at least two of the highest-tier, rarest NFTs (also the Reignmaker tier) plus three NFTs from the second-highest tier (Legendary). NFTs at these tiers are expensive. Not just expensive in the way that, like, a steak dinner is expensive, but expensive in the way that buying even one of them should trigger a mandatory visit to a gambling addiction counselor, if not sirens and a straitjacket. Back in 2022a Reignmaker-level Ja’Marr Chase NFT from something called the Field Pass Promo Set could be purchased directly from the DraftKings Reignmaker Marketplace for a whopping $32,100.
Reignmakers users purchased NFTs at various levels with the expectation that owning them would convey better odds of winning contests hosted on DraftKings. This was the gamification element of Reignmakers, which emerged several months after DraftKings began trading and minting its NFTs. But as with all NFTs, a very large part of the real appeal for its buyers was the expectation, however insane, that these worthless, virtually worthless, infinitely duplicable digital images would increase in value over time. Now that both the Reignmakers game and the Reignmakers marketplace have been shut down, Reignmakers NFT holders are worried that their investments may have suddenly lost all monetary value. One Discord user described Tuesday as “a bad day to wake up and realize you have $2,000 worth of unopened NFL Rookie Packs”; Another user asked the group if they should expect “a refund” on the $10,000 they’ve already spent on Reignmakers NFTs this year. A pessimistic Reddit user posted tuesday that they would sue DraftKings if they were forced to take a total loss on a Reignmakers NFT collection worth approximately $100,000.
The game (scam?) was built to make numbers like these not only possible, but somewhat easily achievable. A user who intended to compete from a position of strength in multiple overlapping high-profile contests at the same time, and who had been in the blockchain madhouse for a period of years, could easily have spent six figures on Reignmakers NFTs. DraftKings used non-gaming incentives to entice players to spend more and more money, much like casinos give away free suites to players who over-bet on blackjack. Another Reddit user lamented the loss of the additional prizes and ranking bonuses he had hoped to earn in the upcoming NFL season by having a portfolio of NFTs that had reached the highest levels of value and prestige. “I was already loaded up on 2024 creation tokens and rookie debut cards,” said this Reignmakers userwho claimed his portfolio was finally “close to the top 250 overall.”
Dufoe’s complaint says the NFTs minted by DraftKings for Reignmakers qualify as securities, function like securities, and should be regulated as securities. In its motion to dismiss, DraftKings attempted to position its NFTs as game pieces — eye-wateringly expensive, yes, but essentially the same thing as Magic: The Gathering cards or Monopoly hotels. The court, in resolving these arguments, applied what’s known as “the Howey test,” referencing a case from 1946 in which the U.S. Supreme Court established a standard for determining whether a specific instrument qualifies as an investment contract. Judge Dennis J. Casper, in ruling against DraftKings’ motion, concluded that Dufoe could plausibly argue that Reignmakers’ NFT transactions represent “the pooling of assets from multiple investors in such a manner that all share in the profits and risks of the enterprise,” arguing that DraftKings’ absolute control over the game and marketplace effectively binds the financial interests of the company and the buyers, the latter of whom depend on the viability of both for their NFTs to retain any value.
Reignmakers users are different from Monopoly players in at least one crucial way: A person who buys a Monopoly board has no expectation from Hasbro that those little red and green pieces will appreciate in value. It’s a game! No matter what any hysterically conflicted party may say to the contrary, that’s not what NFT collecting is. DraftKings had been selling Reignmakers NFTs for months before they were gamified, and Dufoe, in his complaint, cites public comments made by DraftKings spokespeople that seem to explicitly position Reignmakers NFTs as assets with independent monetary value beyond their utility in Reignmakers contests. Judge Casper, in his ruling on the motion to dismiss, cites a Twitter account associated with a podcast run by DraftKings CEO Matthew Kalish, who in a tweet described NFTs as “the opportunity to invest in startups, artists, operations, and entrepreneurs all at once.” This is probably the kind of thing that NFT peddlers should stop saying. This advice assumes, of course, that NFTs will continue to exist as instruments on the other side of this and other lawsuits.
DraftKings has posted a worryingly sparse FAQ at the bottom of the your ad Tuesday, anticipating but largely failing to address questions from players who see this as yet another in a long line of brutal blockchain rug pulls. In a hilarious reversal of existing Reignmakers policy, Reignmakers users are now allowed by DraftKings to withdraw their Reignmakers NFTs from their DraftKings portfolios and into their personal NFT wallets, where those NFTs will have precisely zero value, to anyone, for the rest of all time. There’s also vague language about Reignmakers users having the option to “relinquish” their NFTs back to DraftKings in exchange for “cash payments,” subject to “certain conditions” and according to an as-yet-unspecified formula that will take into account, among other things, the “size and quality” of a player’s collection.
Reignmakers users are not optimistic. Those who claim to have been victims of other blockchain market crashes are warning their peers on Discord and Reddit to expect payouts that amount to pennies on the dollar; in the absence of any clarifying information, users are unsure whether cashing out their NFTs from Reignmakers to their personal NFT wallets, for reasons that completely pass any and all understanding, would effectively preclude the possibility of delivering these silly digital tokens back to DraftKings. It remains to be seen what exactly DraftKings has in mind with the “certain conditions” attached to the delivery process. There is much that has yet to be resolved. A DraftKings spokesperson contacted by Defector indicated that more time would be needed to answer a list of specific questions and issued a statement noting that it is “in DraftKings’ DNA to innovate and disrupt to provide the best possible gaming experiences for our customers.” The original complaint is embedded below.
Do you know anything about the demise of Reignmakers, either from the consumer side or from the DraftKings side? We’d love to hear from you. Get it in touch!
Recommended
NFTs
There Will Be No More ‘Mario & Sonic’ Olympics Because of NFTs
![There Will Be No More 'Mario & Sonic' Olympics Because of NFTs](https://tokentalk.top/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/There-Will-Be-No-More-Mario-Sonic-Olympics-Because.jpg)
Nintendo and SEGA have been teaming up with the Olympics for several years now in the popular Mario & sonic in the Olympic Games series, but a new report claims the International Olympic Committee has abandoned the series in favor of new deals in eSports and NFTs.
According to Eurogamer“A veteran behind the series,” Lee Cocker, told the outlet that the IOC chose not to renew its license with SEGA and Nintendo, letting it expire in 2020. “They wanted to look at other partners and NFTs and eSports,” Cocker told Eurogamer. “Basically, the IOC wanted to bring [it] turn inward and look for other partners so they could get more money.”
Mario & Sonic at the Olympic Games is a series that has been running since 2008, with six main games covering the regular and Winter Olympics. In the games, players could control various characters from the Mario and Sonic franchises and compete in Olympic sporting events.
It’s no secret that NFTs are a big part of this year’s Paris 2024 Olympics. Olympics Go! Paris 2024 is a mobile and mobile-connected game your site states that players can “join the excitement of the Paris 2024 Olympic Games with nWay’s officially licensed, commemorative NFT Digital Pins collection honoring Paris 2024!”
As for eSports, Saudi Arabia will host the ESports Olympic Games in 2025. This is part of a partnership with the Saudi National Olympic Committee (NOC) that is expected to last for the next 12 years and is expected to feature regular events.
IOC President Thomas Bach said: “By partnering with the Saudi NOC, we also ensure that Olympic values are respected, in particular with regard to the game titles on the programme, the promotion of gender equality and the engagement with young audiences who are embracing esports.”
In other news, Someone claimed they’re suing Bandai Namco because Elden Ring is too difficult.
-
Videos4 months ago
Money is broke!! The truth about our financial system!
-
News4 months ago
More Crypto AI Alliances Emerge Following $7.5 Billion Token Merger — TradingView News
-
Altcoins4 months ago
Render vs. Theta; Which DePIN Altcoin to buy in May
-
News4 months ago
Over 1 million new tokens launched since April
-
Videos4 months ago
Fantom: Potential FTM Price and BIG Updates – The Latest!!
-
NFTs4 months ago
Surprisingly, Bored Apes is now laying off employees as the NFT market disintegrates
-
Videos4 months ago
Recession soon?? What this means for you and your wallet!!
-
NFTs4 months ago
Solana NFTs jump 30% in 24 hours: what’s behind the increase?
-
Memecoins4 months ago
When memecoins reign supreme in the ecosystem!
-
Memecoins4 months ago
Solana Dev hospitalized with third-degree burns while trying to pump Meme Coin
-
Videos3 months ago
Crypto News: ETH ETFs, Pro-Crypto Politics, UNI, DOGE & MORE!
-
NFTs4 months ago
EduTech Platform Banksters Airdrops NFTs Worth 100K USDT